Search for: "Matter of Wright" Results 501 - 520 of 2,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd & Anor was heard on 22nd and 23rd July. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of D (a child), heard 3-4 Oct 2018. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trenga could still toss the verdict and scheduled a September hearing on the matter. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of NY (A child), heard 18 Jul 2019. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm by William S. Koski
School officials should be aware of and comply with the laws of their jurisdictions, as a general matter. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 7:19 am
Patricia Junquera who is the head of psychiatry at CHS and Edith Wright who is the Acting Director of CHS. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook has 30,000 people (a mix of employees and contractors, if that matters) working on Safety & Security. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
It is not inherently problematic (constitutionally or legally speaking) for a President to take a firm, even dominant, hand in overseeing, limiting, or, for that matter, terminating federal criminal investigations; if President Trump had terminated any DOJ investigation of Hillary Clinton that was still ongoing when he took office in the name of national healing, no one would think that improper. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Raya Data Matters had a news article about a previous claim that the ICO’s own website did not comply with GDPR in regards to cookies. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
June 2019 might become known in Illinois as the month the state legalized marijuana use, but I hope it remains better remembered as the 100th anniversary of Illinois’ ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment—the provision in the Constitution that prohibited discrimination in voting on account of sex. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Another reason for this was the questioning during the sixth trial, when prosecutors struck Carolyn Wright, purportedly because she knew several defense witnesses and had worked at the same store where Flowers' father had worked. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notwithstanding these efforts to make a federal case out of the matter, the question of whether a state can require, forbid, or permit state and local governmental assistance to the feds in immigration enforcement is really up to each state and its own laws. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
I really do have the greatest respect for the department and have supported the DOJ's positions on various occasions (once even in the "travel ban" context), but--sorry to say so--no matter how hard I try, I can't have respect for such idiocies as footnote 7.Other than that footnote, that amicus brief is reasonable, even though reasonable people can disagree with it. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:58 am by Vishnu Kannan
Collaborates with GS Communication staff on matters pertaining to public/private events and GS Development staff on matters pertaining to donor proposals. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm by Ilya Somin
But it also created a backlash in one market, Dallas-Fort Worth, located in the backyard of [future] Speaker of the House Jim Wright. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(quoting Wright &Miller § 4423, at 612); see Kroeger v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But Kimble spoke expansively about stare decisis as a general matter. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Any student or scholar researching a matter of federal law would be well advised to consult the set early in their research. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Maybe this idea makes sense as a matter of policy in some areas of regulation, but we don’t see much constitutional support for imposing a general ripeness requirement on legislatures. [read post]