Search for: "Merck and Co,"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
" The story reports on payments by Eli Lilly and Co., down 46 percent since 2009; GlaxoSmithKline down 29 percent. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
It was developed by Merck & Co. and is marketed worldwide as Prinivil or Tensopril and by AstraZeneca as Zestril. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:30 am
Fosamax, from Merck & Co, was approved in 1995 as the first approved bisphosphonate. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 705 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:04 am
According to the FDA's Announcement for this September 2011 meeting, these two advisory committees will consider the benefits and risks of long-term use of osteoporosis medications in the bisphosphonate class of drugs, which were identified by the FDA as: FOSAMAX (alendronate sodium) tablets and solution and FOSAMAX PLUS D (alendronate sodium/cholecalciferol) tablets, Merck & Co., Inc.; ACTONEL (risedronate sodium) tablets, ATELVIA (risedronate sodium) delayed… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:33 pm
Merck & Co. currently faces hundreds of Fosamax jaw decay lawsuits and Fosamax bone fracture lawsuits that have been filed by individuals who claim the drug maker failed to adequately warn about the potential side effects. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
One of the latest is drugmaker Merck & Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Co., 129 U.S. 530, 537 (1889)). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 9:17 am
Somehow the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse these concepts in an important decision this week, Merck & Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
Merck & Co., 507 F.3d 1357, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
Merck & Co., 507 F.3d 1357, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
Teva was cited; Merck & Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
Teva was cited; Merck & Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Merck & Co., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 3375104 (2d Cir. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
If a message conveyed by an ad is literally true or ambiguous, the plaintiff must prove actual deception or a tendency to deceive and it may do so with properly conducted consumer evidence (Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharm., Co. v Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharm (1994)). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz P.C. is currently investigating a potential class action against Merck & Co. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 10:14 pm
Merck & Co., Inc., No. 10-1137-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
