Search for: "Perez v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has roundly rejected the plaintiff’s arguments in that case, firmly upholding the Department’s actions. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
The court relied on Wolf v D.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 11:56 am
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez of Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 3:00 pm
The petitioner’s reply brief is due Tuesday in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 8:39 am
We have a strong dissent.The case is Murray v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:00 am
Perez is a supporting case. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:42 am
For a good summary of how these claims work, see Kelleher v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:50 pm
Va. 2007), with her fallback position being the DTC advertising exception allowed in Perez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
Alfonso-Perez, I knew exactly where he was going, because it just so happens that United State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:42 am
" State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:30 pm
State was the brother of the Moore in Jonathan Moore v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:42 am
” At the Knowledge Center of the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at last week’s decision in Perez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm
District Court ruling in Perez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:11 am
See Cumbie v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:48 am
Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825, 829 (6th Cir.2003) (en banc) (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 8:50 am
The case was Edward and Carmelita O’Donnell v. [read post]