Search for: "State v. Penns" Results 501 - 520 of 1,376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court held that the students lacked standing to sue any of the defendants other than Penn, and that they failed to state a claim against Penn because student athletes are not employees under the FLSA. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Ryan McKeen
Colonial Penn Ins Co., 203 Conn. 305 (1987). [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
Penn. magistrate report June 28, 2016 and district court approval of magistrate report August 4, 2016) [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:11 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Engle (Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law) has posted Comparing Supreme Court Jurisprudence in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Mission Statement: The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy (ASCE) is a non-profit, non-political organization incorporated in the state of Maryland in 1990. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Penn.), decided Monday: Plaintiff Jonathan Yox is a [Pennsylvania] state correctional officer. . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm by Schachtman
Kaye, Associate Dean for Research and Distinguished Professor, The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State Law) Translating Science into Policy: The Role of Decision Science prepared by: – Paul Brest, Former Dean and Professor Emeritus (active), Stanford Law School Placing a Bet: A New Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease prepared by: – Kevin W. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:31 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kaye (Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law) has posted Deadly Statistics: Quantifying an 'Unacceptable Risk' in Capital Punishment (Law, Probability & Risk, Vol. 15, No. 4, Dec. 2016) on SSRN. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:37 pm
The case of King v Burwell  had  reached the US Supreme Court because of the phrase "exchanges established by the state. [read post]