Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 1:57 am
Last year the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) remitted to the General Court Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P Pi-Design AG, Bodum France SAS and Bodum Logistics A/S v OHIM, Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am
In Amcor Flexibles Singen GMBG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:30 pm
” Anderson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
See Abel v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:10 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
(citing Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:14 pm
See Pfaff v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
[Spier v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions Patent minefield now a risk for trademark owners - District Court E D Missouri applies MedImmune in Express Scripts Inc v Intel Corp. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
Such is the case with United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:43 pm
Jensen v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:54 am
Griffin Partnership, Cancellation No. 92052576 [Petition for cancellation of registrations for the marks Cinque for shirts t-shirts and CINQUE & Design for "suits, trouser-suits, two-piece skirt suits, trousers, jeans, skirts, jackets, blazers, coats, scarves, belts, footwear and headgear, namely, hats and caps," on the ground of abandonment].June 16, 2015 - 11 AM: In re Dignity Health, Serial No. 85473422 et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Ninth Chamber of the General Court gave judgment today in a fierce battle over a Community trade mark application in Case T‑170/12, Beyond Retro Ltd v OHIM, the other party to the proceedings being a US company, S&K Garments, Inc., which was victorious in the Board of Appeal. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:51 am
See Thorogood v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:58 pm
In Girdley v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Narragansett Coated Paper Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 12:11 pm
In UCB, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
The underpinning of Daubert is that an expert’s opinion could be unreliable and the jury could not figure that out, even given cross-examination and argument, because the jurors are deferent to a qualified expert (i.e., the white lab coat effect). [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm
My friends who worked at B&B used the adjective “Bottsian” to describe a certain aloofness and manner. [read post]
