Search for: "United States v. Sample"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 10:42 pm
The defendant relied on two recent United States Supreme Court decision Crawford v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:21 pm
Winfield v City of New York. 2017 WL 5664852 (SDNY 11/27/2017) [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
It draws its authority from the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which granted the Attorney General power to direct federal agencies to collect DNA from “individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted or from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm
United States, 351 F.3d 1374, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am
Besser v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:41 am
Facts: This case (Monica and Richard Beyer v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:03 am
Anne Arundel Medical Center, Inc. et al – United States District Court – District of Maryland – May 4th, 2018) involves a medical malpractice claim. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:25 pm
Brown et al – United States District Court – District of Arizona – May 10th, 2019) involves a dispute over medical billing. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Div. 2007) State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:04 am
In a decision that advances the predictive coding ball one step further, United States District Judge Andrew L. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
Code §1201 - KidnappingUnited States of America v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
Code §1201 - KidnappingUnited States of America v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:34 pm
But as Judge Rakoff sums up the conundrum in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
” Procedural History: At trial, the jury was instructed to consider liability for all “United States sales,” which included “all kits made, used, offered for sale, sold within the United States or imported in the United States as well as kits made outside the United States where a substantial portion of the components are supplied from the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
” (In an earlier opinion, the Seventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Crime & Consequences Blog has this item:Cross-Examining Lab Techs The Ninth Circuit today issued an interesting, if quirky, opinion on the issue of the right to cross-examine lab technicians in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:23 pm
Cornhusker Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
