Search for: "United States v. Woods" Results 501 - 520 of 1,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This statement is unworthy of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm by Barry Barnett
And they brought the action in California -- not where Daimler's main United States sub (Mercedes-Benz USA or MBUSA) had incorporated (Delaware) or the state in which MBUSA kept its main place of business. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 If there are new instructions or legal principles included in the Court's response, and they are harmful to your case, object, citing this case, and noting that the defense did not have an opportunity to respond to or address those instructions during the trial, and this deprives your client of the rights to due process and a fair trial as protected by the New York State and United States constitutions. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by INFORRM
Following the outcome of Schrems I, Schrems reformulated his complaint to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) about data transfers arguing that the United States does not provide adequate protection as United States law requires Facebook Inc. to make the personal data transferred to it available to certain United States authorities, such as the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the data… [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
After 14 relists, the court issued a short per curiam opinion granting the government its requested vacatur of the court of appeals’ decision under United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm by Tom Goldstein
Omar (with the United States as the petitioner) and No. 66-1666, Munaf v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by John Jenkins
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]