Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 6,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 3:35 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
Minority enrollment at the state’s flagship university then started dropping. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), … [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:30 am
Alright employers, grab your pearls and clutch away as you read the facts from El-Hayek v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:42 am
” But in Lindke v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
Well, at least according to a recent decision by the Court of Appeals of Michigan in Michigan One Funding, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
Now, in a case of first impression [footnote 1], the Michigan Court of Appeals has held that a court can review the division of marital assets in a divorce proceeding in the context of a fraudulent transfer claim. ______________________________________________________________________ Footnote 1 Estes v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
It is the spirit of the Supreme Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Jovine v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am
His appeal was denied by the 11th Circuit, but Bostock’s attorneys argued the circuit’s precedents conflicted with two United States Supreme Court decisions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:18 am
” Davidoff noted that the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision did not state that it was applicable to stock corporations, but it did state that whether or not a fee-shifting by law is enforceable “depends on the manner in which it was adopted and the circumstances in which it was invoked. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
The first conclusion was that Organized Baseball’s exemption from the federal antitrust laws most recently upheld in Toolson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
(On the same day, the court ruled 6-3 to declare Michigan’s undergraduate admissions unconstitutional in the use of race in Gratz v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
