Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 5201 - 5220 of 30,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:17 pm by Gene Quinn
It is fair to say that the eastern half of the United States is experiencing prolonged heat like few can ever remember. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
We must confess, though, that our fair state is not immune to litigious ridiculousness. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Judicial deference to PERB’s expertise in providing a remedy after it sustains an improper employer practice charge is not absoluteTown of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08481.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances with respect to public employees in New York State. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08481.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances with respect to public employees in New York State. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by David Lynn
I don’t know about you, but I have been fielding my fair share of questions this reporting season regarding the SEC’s changes to the share repurchase disclosure rules that were vacated late last year by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]