Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 5201 - 5220 of 13,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“McAfee”)in the United States District Court for the NorthernDistrict of California for infringement of U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
For better or worse, litigation has become an adjunct to regulation in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Schachtman
Background The major impetus for science tutorials seems to have come from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by Gene Quinn
Given the amount of time and energy devoted to this fight by The Regents of the University of California, an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit seems likely. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm by H. Scott Leviant
United States, 738 F.2d 1057, 1063 (9th Cir. 1984), apply to claims for unpaid wages under California Labor Code sections 510, 1194, and 1197? [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  Part II focuses on the new CIA guidelines and their treatment of publicly available information and related issues, including bulk collection, querying, retention and dissemination, and undisclosed participation in organizations inside the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
California alone has 75,000 — more than any other state. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project – Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
United States (2005) 546 U.S. 12, 17–18; see also Bowles v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project - Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]