Search for: "CO.1. Means"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 16,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
"Even before reading the article, I'm thinking: 1. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 11:12 am
The Hearing Officer relied extensively on the judgment in Love & Co Pte Ltd v The Carat Club Pte Ltd [2009] 1 SLR(R) 561. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:43 pm
In part, this means that House Democratic chairs of the national security and foreign policy committees will need to decide which oversight issues they will tackle and in what order. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:43 pm
In part, this means that House Democratic chairs of the national security and foreign policy committees will need to decide which oversight issues they will tackle and in what order. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
§ 110.1(b)(1)). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:58 am
Truly amazing that all of these companies went from slide deck to B in approximately 3 1/2 years. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
But what does that actually mean? [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:16 pm
Aug. 1, 2018). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:28 am
The Supreme Court held that impossibility could be an affirmative defense if the employer could prove that: 1) it would have been impossible to comply with the specific safety requirement and compliance would have precluded performance of the work at hand; and 2) no alternative means of employee protection were available. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 5:30 am
To avoid challenges to the overbreadth of a restrictive covenant, employers should adhere to the standards set forth in the Illinois Supreme Court’s seminal decision, Reliable Fire Equipment Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
Majerowicz and appellant no. 1, Habitat Israel (as its licensee), exclusively used the mark HABITAT in Israel. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 3:30 am
In this 2015 decision, the Board concluded that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law; and (2) they share or co-determine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 4:55 pm
#1: 47 USC 230 The law was enacted in 1996 (as part of the Communications Decency Act, discussed below) during the heyday of the cyberspace exceptionalism movement–about the same time as Barlow’s Declaration of Independence and Johnson/Post’s Internet self-governance article. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
Since at least its 1911 decision in American Land Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Cheese hit the news, transformative art was all the rage (or prompting rage), that monkey selfie case finally reached the end of the line, Canadian musician and now photographer Bryan Adams pointed out some of the realities of what lobbying in the 'name of' creators, authors and artists actually means (and often it is certainly not for the benefit those very creators), and a case that the recorded music sector seemingly 'lost' ended up looking like a big win! [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 9:05 pm
He is scheduled to formally begin his second five-year term of office on 1 June 2019. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
¶ 1. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Regulation is Based Upon Scientific Determinations of Causation In his oral argument, Gottesman asserted that regulators (as opposed to the scientific community) are in charge of determining causation,1 and environmental regulations are based upon scientific causation determinations.2 By the time that the Supreme Court heard argument in the Daubert case, this conflation of scientific and regulatory standards for causal conclusions was fairly well debunked.3 Gottesman’s attempt to… [read post]
