Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 5,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am
The defendants filed a motion to dismiss and the Judge made a nod in the direction of Twombly and its requirement that the plaintiff supply "'enough details about the subject matter of the case to present a story that holds together.'" Cardenas, slip op. at 4, quoting Estate of Davis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
However, when the recall election of Democratic Governor Gray Davis succeeded, it meant that Arnold could fulfill his dream, because he could run for governor in an open race, where he won because of his high name recognition. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
Finally, the Sixteenth Amendment speaks of taxes on income.In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
The court’s opinion cited cases in the United States Supreme Court in which NALA filed an amicus brief, Missouri v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:50 am
Moreover, under the framework of Katz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
The victim in this Davie County murder case was a “neighborhood runner,” running errands for people in general, and allegedly running drugs for the defendant. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
The three Degraffenreid dissenters suggest that stray dicta from an 1892 case that in no way involved the limits that a state constitution might place on a state legislature in this arena—and casual quotation from this case in a part of the discredited Bush v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am
Davis, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Petitioner): John M. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:14 pm
The Supreme Court of Missouri’s decision in Utility Service Co., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:28 pm
” Davis Next Friend LaShonda D. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
" (See Davis, 117 Md. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
What this meant is that colleges didn’t subject themselves to liability to the accuser by imposing a lesser remedy than expulsion, and that the circuit was emphasizing a return to the criteria stated by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:22 am
The Court in Terry v. [read post]
