Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 10,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
United States, language commanding the states to act can be interpreted in one of two ways. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
To compromise a dispute over whether a restatement of detention authority would extend it to U.S. citizens, Congress wrote into a military defense bill a statement that nothing in the bill “shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful residents of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
" They put that on the end of every single bill, which means they can basically put anything in it, that they don't want to be in the title to spark someones attention! [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
United States The EARN IT Act has returned to the Senate and House, which has prompted a response from Riana Pfefferkorn reminding Congress of the problems the proposed legislation causes for encryption, privacy and online speech, without guaranteeing improvement to children’s safety online. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 5:02 pm
By Merrill BentAnderson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
Ventura County District Attorney Gregory Totten, prior to the announcement of the Johnson decision, requested the Attorney General’s opinion on two questions: Does Penal Code section 832.7, subdivision (a), authorize a district attorney, for the purpose of complying with the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Then again, they may have believed it unnecessary because the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Bill of Rights. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 4:49 am
Dorf contends...the tradition of contingency arrangements is even older than the United States of America. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
" That standard is codified in the Official Code of Conduct rules applying to "United States circuit judges, district judges, Court of International Trade judges, Court of Federal Claims judges, bankruptcy judges, and magistrate judges. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
Wahl v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
President Biden stated that in addition to economic sanctions that the United States had previously imposed on Russia, the United States would also prohibit Russian planes from entering U.S. air space. [read post]
Illinois Court Sets Elements for Retaliatory Discharge Under False Claims Act in Partnership Dispute
9 Sep 2016, 9:25 am
Based in Chicago and Oak Brook, Ill., our Cicero and Aurora area qui tam and False Claims Act lawyers stand ready to represent whistleblowers throughout the United States — regardless of whether prosecutors have decided to join the lawsuit. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
United States In the United States, successful legislative reform in Oregon, Vermont, and Washington has encouraged other states to consider passing permissive assisted suicide legislation. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:37 am
Jackson was our first imperial president and fashioned precedents that still structure separation of powers struggles in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:51 pm
Article II of the Constitution states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
