Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 31,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
In Waln v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
This position was seemingly validated by the First Department’s 2009 decision in Vukovich v. 1345 Fee, LLC. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 8:22 am
The lesson in the Business Court's first opinion of the year, Allen Smith Investment Properties, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In Edison v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:10 am
" The complaint (full text) in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 4:10 am
In Russell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Williams v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100 AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332*; 2. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
In Wisdom Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Beausejour v Chamberlin Plumbing & Heating, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:26 pm
Cir. 2018); ACCO Brands Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 6:13 am
That's what happened in State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
In Casteel v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 11:45 am
See Thompson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Since there was no direct evidence copying had taken place, the judge followed the leading authority Designers Guild, which stated that if the claimant demonstrates sufficient similarity and the defendant had prior access to the claimant’s work, the burden of proof passes to the defendant to satisfy the judge that the similarities did not result from copying. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
In UAlberta Pro-Life v Governors of the University of Alberta, (Alberta Ct. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:42 am
Peck v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the court explained that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing* and without a statement of reasons in the absence of any demonstration that the termination was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:05 am
In Griffith v. [read post]
