Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 5321 - 5340 of 10,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm by Robin E. Shea
The Incognito-Martin situation does appear to have prompted some constructive action. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by John Bursch
  The Hobby Lobby and Conestoga cases challenge the Mandate and raise essentially two legal questions:  (1) can corporations engage in religious exercise; and (2) if so, does the Mandate violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The process of compliance with the new requirements of the OFCCP’s revised regulations on protected veterans and workers with disabilities is “going to be a fairly easy transition for a good chunk of the [contractor] universe,” said OFCCP expert John C. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by WSLL
Cranfill, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: John P. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 9:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In particular, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen warns taxpayers to be extra vigilant, noting, “These schemes jump every year at tax time. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:47 am by John Day
 In this case, plaintiff’s motion was one to name a new party in place of a John Doe defendant. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
The bankruptcy court ruled against Pierce for a number of reasons: (1) he didn’t raise this argument at the right time in the proceedings, so he waived it; (2) anyway, he voluntarily submitted himself to bankruptcy court jurisdiction; (3) anyway, Vickie’s counterclaim didn’t interfere with the probate proceeding or imply the invalidity of the will. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by Lisa Baird
This post was written by Nan Bonifant, Brad Rostolsky, and John Wyand On February 6, 2014, the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
A: On July 13, 1836, US Patent Number 1 was issued to John Ruggles for traction wheels. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:30 pm
Jan. 27, 2011).Issues[1] [Does] federal patent law waive tribal sovereign immunity because [35 U.S.C. [read post]