Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 24,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner had appealed the decision and order of the United States District Court dismissing his claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:02 pm
The Coronavirus (COVID-19) has swept the world, the booming economy of the United States has ground to a halt, State Governors have issued stay-at-home orders, and businesses across the country have closed their doors. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
Now, as some states allow businesses to reopen while others keep restrictions firmly in place, what powers can the president wield? [read post]
13 May 2020, 11:03 am
On April 6, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States answered the question as to whether 29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:02 am
But there are about 2300 local prosecutors in the United States. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
United States, 483 U. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
If a product claims to be assembled in the United States, the company must ensure that it “is last substantially transformed in the United States, [its] principal assembly takes place in the United States, and [that] United States assembly operations are substantial. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Last Week in the Courts The trial of the data protection case of Greystoke v Financial Conduct Authority which was due to take place On 6 May 2020 the Court of Appeal (Flaux, Popplewell and Dingemans LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Wright v Ver. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
