Search for: "High v State"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2008, 8:43 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm
The Secretary of State sought to challenge the Immigration Judge’s decision on the basis that he had failed to provide adequate reasons for finding that Mr Ibrahim enjoyed family life with his wife and children; that he had failed to have regard to Mr Ibrahim’s criminality, and that he had applied an incorrect test thereby creating too high a hurdle for the Secretary of State. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
Rosalind English analyses the implications of the High Court’s decision. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
The High Court found the case required little discussion. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Loranzo v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 1:37 pm
”Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Abood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 8:56 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:56 pm
(The petition is No. 07-468, American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:51 am
The district court relied on Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm
On 24 September 2016 Ms Middleton and her fiancé James Matthews were granted an urgent injunction in the High Court by Mr Justice Dove preventing publication of photographs stolen from her iCloud account. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 am
Ctr. of Queens v Microtech Contr. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:17 pm
Samsung case in the Northern District of California and the Apple v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
Wells and Noel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
In Burns v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:15 am
Equal pay for equal workBertoldi v State of New York, 275 AD2d 227; Motion to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 706; Motion to appeal on constitutional grounds denied, 95 NY2d 958Section 115 of the Civil Service Law provides that State employees are entitled to equal pay for equal work, and regular increases in pay in proper proportion to increase of ability, increase of output and increase of equality of work demonstrated in service.While Section 115 applies only to employees of the… [read post]
