Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
(relisted after the October 6, October 13, October 27, November 3, November 9 and November 21 conferences) Floyd v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
The case, Data Direct Technologies Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc [2009] EWHC 97 (Ch), was heard by Mr Justice Floyd who gave judgment on 26 January, and picked up by the Lawtel subscription-only service.Data Direct claimed payment of software maintenance fees which, it alleged, were due from retail giants Marks & Spencer under the terms of a software licence. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:03 am
" The case is Magness v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
This was the appeal by Dr Reddy's against the refusal of Mr Justice Floyd (noted here by the IPKat) to revoke Eli Lilly's patent for olanzapine, an anti-psychotic agent used in the treatment of schizophrenia. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Bowman III, Floyd R. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:44 pm
Floyd, 768 S.W.2d 57 (Ky. 1989), the Court stated that “guardian” means a legally appointed guardian. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:15 pm
For example the page on Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:15 pm
For example the page on Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Young v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:21 pm
The limits on indoor worship services, the state stressed, cannot be compared to “the spontaneous protests after George Floyd’s death,” which occurred outdoors. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
The second group of witnesses were law professor Jamin Raskin, legendary First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams, and North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick, Jr. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
" State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
” In fact it was the 1976 case, Buckley v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Rather, in Wilson v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am
University of Maryland-Eastern Shore, May 21, 2015, Floyd, H.). [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
Floyd J dismissed the claimants' action. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:17 am
In fact, in 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Turner v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
