Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 521 - 540 of 893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
            In In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 11:34 am by Bill Marler
The emergency department physician reviewed Craig’s medical history, medications, and most recent illness course secondary to the pemphigus foliaceous. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:03 am
We’ve long advised medical consumers to research hospitals they’re considering using for the kind and frequency of errors they make. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
"California Dreamin'" is the theme of this year's event, and it seems like an appropriate motif, particularly in light of the state of Utilization Review and it's red headed step child, Independent Medical Review. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
Last week, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Lydia Zuraw
Prime Minister David Cameron announced the creation of a new review panel that will investigate antibiotic overuse generally and why new drugs are not being developed. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:02 am by S2KM Limited
Existing self-settled (first party) special needs trusts should be reviewed, in the context of the ACA's prohibition against pre-existing condition exclusions and available medical insurance options, and in many cases terminated. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Slowly but surely, we’re seeing more and more commentary on the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which was announced Monday. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
  The relevant part of the statute for this discussion is §40:1299.47, concerning medical review panels. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:19 am by David DePaolo
Hopefully one can seek shelter.But if you're out on a bicycle hopefully you have a tail wind home. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Thereafter, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, the previous decisions were reversed and that court held that the communications from the attorney to the expert were not discoverable. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:44 am by David DePaolo
" I put guidelines in quotes because though they are called that, in practice they are dictatorial instructions - utilization review, and now independent medical review, follow the "guidelines" in an almost rote fashion with little to no exception.This removes physician medical discretion, and adjuster discretion. [read post]