Search for: "John Does 1-5 Companies"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
They did so in association with a scientist, Dr Skovmand, who was experienced in the field and who, although not previously employed by Vestergaard, had been engaged as a consultant by the company for a long time. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm
I would like to thank John for his willingness to allow me to publish his article on this site. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:02 am
See Ex. 1 to Defs.' Opp'n to Pls.' Mot. at A05645. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 9:03 pm
John, not Peter, because a year ago John registered that e-mail address.John has no idea what's going on, and worse yet, how does he prove he did nothing? [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Cases and items related to equal employment opportunitySource: EEO/iNews - iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity, © 2009 John D. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:18 am
The court agreed that the plaintiff did not plausibly allege the existence of a “group” subject to liability pursuant to Section 16(b).The plaintiff initially relied on the “safe harbor” of Rule 13d-5(b)(2) to allege that the defendants engaged in group activity because their conduct does not meet the criteria enumerated thereunder to be exempted from being considered a “group. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
A low-cost alternative, if it materializes, may tempt smaller activists—perhaps including better-funded versions of the “issues” activists now plastering corporate boardrooms with various 14a-8 stockholder proposals—to nominate one or two directors to press their concerns in the boardroom.[1] However, Rule 14a-19 does not address the longstanding question of just what information the nominating stockholder should disclose to voting stockholders. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
TTAB Issued 36 Precedential Opinions in 2016Text John L. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
5. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:41 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Jeffrey White dismissed the case, finding the ordinance does not directly regulate who can speak or what they can say. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:23 am
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Peretz, Steven) (Entered: 02/11/2011) 2/11/2011 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case - Documents Improperly Arranged. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
– John Jenkins [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
(SPDC) holds 30%.[7] SPDC, incorporated in Nigeria, is a joint subsidiary of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and Shell Transport and Trading Company, holding companies incorporated in the Netherlands and England respectively. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
While, technically, the interim rule does not impose any new requirement on U.S. businesses, because all are already required to comply with U.S. export requirements, the interim rule does impose additional risks and liabilities on defense contractors because a violation of U.S. export laws could now also result in a breach of contract. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:06 pm
Nor does it incorporate any Facebook interventions that may have taken place, on or off-platform, since September 2018. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:21 am
Pretty neat when that does the trick, don't you think? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:02 am
Nazareth, John G. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
The 9th Circuit does not. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am
Ct. 213 (1987); 1 Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B] at 2-16. [read post]