Search for: "L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS INC." Results 521 - 540 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
This was a very dynamic issue; as the 1965 Supplemental Report of the Register pointed out, “Anyone looking for an example of how fast things move in the field of author’s rights can find no more striking illustration than the problem of community antennas and their liability under the copyright law. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Service Employees Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm by Barry Sookman
Craig, who teaches copyright and trade-mark law, among other courses is also a co-author (with Barry Sookman and Steven Mason) of a casebook on copyright law and the author of Copyright, Communication and Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law (Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011), and Trade-marks & Unfair Competition Law in Canada: Cases and Commentary, co-edited with Bita Amani (Toronto, Canada: Carswell, Thomson Reuters, 2011). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:37 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Caching entities are provided with a safe harbor under L. 32-3-4 of the French telecommunication code, while hosts are provided a safe harbor by article 6-I-3° of France's Law No. 2004-575 (June 21, 2004) on confidence in the digital economy (LCEN). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Final version to be published as “Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self constitution: The enforcement of human rights by Apple, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
An entire community has been traumatized. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Chowdhury's proposed final judgment would impose a sizable judgment against the whole Prenda team: It is hereby ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Chowdhury recover jointly and severally from Plaintiff AF Holdings, Inc., Prenda Law, Inc., John L. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’150 patent col. 38 l. 53–col. 39 l. 5.The prior artOn appeal, the relevant prior art is European Patent No. [read post]