Search for: "People v Bright" Results 521 - 540 of 1,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 2:45 pm
 The only caveat is that it's a lot easier to write sentences that purely vent than it is to write (what I hope would be) sophisticated legal analysis of a published opinion that was written with lengthy pondering by incredibly sophisticated people who were confirmed by the Senate (plus their incredibly bright clerks).Particularly when every mistake or legal error that you might make, plus people who disagree with you on the merits, may give rise to substantial… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am by SHG
  And for those who doubt the existence of karma, it came back to him the next day, when the United States Supreme Court affirmed his decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The story told here is not a conventional tale of great inventors, bright ideas, and the inevitable march of scientific progress. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:59 am by Gene Killian
With that background, consider the New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent decision in Templo Fuente de Vida Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The device at issue is an iPhone 5c, used by Syed Rizwan Farook, who with his wife, Tashfeen Malik, opened fire during a holiday party at the Inland Regional Center in the San Bernardino massacre, killing 14 people and injuring 22 others. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:59 pm
 Or if you break into one apartment, rented by two people, and the door to each occupant's bedroom is locked with a padlock, since it's not really "shared" space, I can see why some people would want that to be two (rather than one) burglaries. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A handful of different entries: The Treatise of Melancholy by Timothy Bright, Oct. 1586; Bright promised not to meddle with the printing of the book until sold. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:57 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 Stay tuned...Uber Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:57 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 Stay tuned...Uber Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:57 am by SHG
On the bright side, the court finally spelled out the obvious: Appellees understand these cases to proscribe tasing when a subject has already been restrained but to sanction the practice when deployed against active resistance. [read post]