Search for: "State v. K. K. C."
Results 521 - 540
of 2,291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
” License § 1(k). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 6:59 am
Stephen C. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:03 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Belloni Decision and Its Legacy: United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
As the title of Ovid's work, late 14c., Metamorphoseos, from Latin Metamorphoses (plural).transform (v.)mid-14c., "change the form of" (transitive), from Old French transformer (14c.), from Latin transformare "change in shape, metamorphose," from trans "across, beyond" (see trans-) + formare "to form" (see form (v.)). [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
In Tagiyev and Huseynov v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
This paper, which updates several key components of our January 2019 tax conformity paper,[1] examines how states have approached provisions closely tied to the competitiveness and neutrality of the tax code, including taxation of GILTI, provision of the deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII), inclusion of income deemed repatriated under § 965, the first-year expensing of short-lived capital investment under § 168(k), and the § 163(j) net interest… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse suggests that Monday’s oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
‘The fountain pen slows you down, and makes you think,’ said John C. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Patterson, Reestablishing the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 38 Arti K. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
K-2 Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Some states have an exception, whereby they allow healthcare clinicians from different professions to be housed together as shareholders within the same professional corporation. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Nixon refused to turn over the tapes made in the Oval Office, lost in the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Geduldig v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
Sarah C. [read post]
