Search for: "United States Court of Appeals 8th Circuit"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 5:52 am
” Here’s Baumgartner’s misprision (in the court of appeals’ view, see United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Courts of Appeals for the Second and Eighth Circuits. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm
Alex Kozinski, chief justice of the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, suggested after an alleged botched execution in Arizona earlier this year that “If we, as a society, cannot stomach the splatter from an execution carried out by firing squad, then we shouldn’t be carrying out executions at all. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
The court dismissed his claim, and Dorris appealed to the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to employers in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota). [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:02 pm
To be sure, Pestrak might have been undermined by United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
In that case, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals held that car accidents are inevitable, that automobile makers have a duty to reduce the risk of injury to drivers and passengers in collisions, and that automobile makers should be liable for any injuries caused by a design defects in vehicles involved in crashes. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
By contrast,“legislative facts,” the Court held, are “established truths, facts or pronouncements that do not change from case to case but apply universally” (Id. at 812, quoting United States v Gould, 536 F2d 216, 220 [8th Cir 1976]). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:42 pm
From yesterday’s United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:14 am
The decision by the District Court was based on the status of the Company's petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court (the "Supreme Court"). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:47 am
From United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:10 am
From United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:28 pm
On April 8th of last year, the court dismissed the complaint on the ground that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Marshall. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
The Court’s selection of these cases, quite irrelevant to its discussion, appears to have come from the Solicitor General’s amicus brief in Matrixx.[2] Although cited for an irrelevant proposition, the Supreme Court’s selection of the Best’s case was puzzling because the Sixth Circuit’s discussion of the issue is particularly muddled. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
