Search for: "United States v. Ball"
Results 521 - 540
of 968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal Unemployment… [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:03 pm
Drug Enforcement Agency and its director Chuck Rosenberg, and, to top it off, the United States of America. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Holmes, Ball State University: Negotiating ‘Best Interest:’ The Voice of the Advocate in the Foster Care System. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Lesson two: The United States thankfully has not gotten as bad as European countries and other countries that require people to carry identification papers. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
It excludes evidence of comparative safety between drugs of the same class, fraud on the FDA (due to Buckman preemption), corporate ethics, and regulatory actions outside of the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:46 am
The recent case of Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Both parties, and the United States as an amicus, agreed in this case that these provisions allow courts the ability to dismiss such suits without prejudice. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
There was a campaign finance case a couple of years ago [called Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989); United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Ball Metal Beverage Container Corporation (Patently-O) District Court W D Wisconsin: The finality of a Patent Reexamination Certificate: Extreme Networks v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:27 am
Eugene Volokh explains the substance of this decision: United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
United States about how "[t]he most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic" comes to mind. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am
District Court in the District of Columbia, and Archivist of the United States David S. [read post]
