Search for: "White v. Marshall" Results 521 - 540 of 867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am by Carlton Larson
  Instead, the most likely successors to Vinson would have been John Marshall Harlan under President Eisenhower or Byron White under President Kennedy. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
 I think the same history suggests that preserving the (white) race and male suprem [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
Deborah White, the president and general counsel of the Retail Litigation Center, an industry group that filed an amicus brief on the side of the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 7:24 am by Marcia Coyle
The three dissenters were Justices Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, and William Brennan. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Hopkins of The John Marshall Law School, Gerald Torres of the University of Texas, and Patricia J. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Perhaps the most famous line written by the Supreme Court is John Marshall’s statement that it is “emphatically the province and the duty of the judicial department to say what the law is”—and without any guidance from the courts, the executive branch has developed more and more aggressive formulations of its authority. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm by Rick Pildes
One very recent Court decision is a perfect test of these thoughts: the Court's 5-4 decision in Arizona Christian School Tuition v. [read post]