Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 5381 - 5400 of 37,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Transport USA, Inc., the state's Fourth District Court of Appeals recently held that a trial court granting a motion to dismiss a case for fraud must make specific written fact findings supporting its conclusion that a plaintiff perpetrated or attempted to perpetrate a fraud on the court. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm
There is no specific indication of an actual agency relationship between Uber and Hirease, either in the complaint or elsewhere in the record. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:51 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Epoxy Solutions Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that the doctrine of mistake did not apply to an invitation to tender. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Of the many images displayed, an image of Trkulja was included, alongside many others, including specific Melbourne underworld figures. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:41 am by Yaron Dori
Inc.; George Salem, Senior Product Manager at Google Inc.; and Craig Spiezle, Executive Director, Founder, and President of the Online Trust Alliance. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ag Pro, Inc., 425 U.S. 273, 282 (1976)). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:05 am by The Public Employment Law Press
., Inc. v Nassau County, 2014 NY Slip Op 00108, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Sheriff Officers Association, Inc., on behalf of one of its members, [Member], filed a grievance with the County on the ground that the County violated the terms of the parties' collective bargaining agreement when it "unilaterally sent Member to an Independent Medical Examiner" and asked him to opine as to whether Member’s medical condition prevented Member from returning… [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc v… [read post]