Search for: "IN RE B E S"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 7,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 1:31 pm
Any such motion must be predicated on a demonstration that either (a) the newly-produced email attachments were relevant and reveal that a meaningful percentage of SEI's relevance determinations were erroneous as to the subset of 126 e-mails and attachments and thus SEI's remaining relevance determinations with respect to other withheld attachments are not reliable; or (b) SEI's explanation for why such nonproduced, non-privileged… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 11:09 am
Luiz Fux Confederação Nacional dos Estabelecimentos de Ensino (Confenem) x Governador de Santa Catarina e Assembleia Legislativa Ação questiona as alíneas “a”, “b” e “c” do inciso VII do art. 82 da Lei Complementar nº 170/1998, do Estado de Santa Catarina, a qual dispõe sobre o sistema estadual de educação. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
The entire opinion is as follows: “In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:19 am
n e? [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
Venkat starts us off:] In re Robert Edward Forchion, Jr., 2011 WL 3834929 (Ca. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
" 42 U.S.C. s 11603(e)(2)(A). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
(See: Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition, Pages 1377 and 996). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:44 am
Note: This week’s gonna be a twofer. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
¶ 28.b.) [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
It’s certainly fueled by the rising cost of discovery, especially e-discovery.) [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
The Federal Circuit considers the legislative history and judicial treatment of § 271(e)(1), and finds that both support the proposition that “§ 271(e)(1) is directed to premarketing approval of generic counterparts before patent expiration. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
The Federal Circuit considers the legislative history and judicial treatment of § 271(e)(1), and finds that both support the proposition that “§ 271(e)(1) is directed to premarketing approval of generic counterparts before patent expiration. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:58 am
So, Student A's scores might be 23, 23, 23, and 3 while Student B's scores might be 18, 18, 18, and 18. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:52 pm
In re Assignment from William H. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Alega violação ao enunciado da Súmula Vinculante nº 14. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Entretanto, cerca de três anos depois, ela recebeu comunicado dando conta de que teria percebido indevidamente valores referentes a quinquênios irregularmente concedidos e que o benefício seria retirado de seu prontuário e, o montante pago a maior, debitado de seus vencimentos mensais. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:19 pm
Looking at the S&P 500 P/E ratio, we're still almost a quarter above the long-term average and three times higher than we were in 1982. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
This is very much like patenting E=mc2 . [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
