Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 119,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
What Hospitality Employers Should Do Now Comply with federal law even though it may contradict some state and municipal laws and until there is resolution in either United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:08 pm
(And, on that front, there's utterly nothing that stops the state, a victim, a reporter, a rabid conservative, or pretty much anyone from cranking out a blog post or press release or even a letter to every single prisoner at San Quentin that encloses the opinion and includes a post-it with the guy's name.)But my guess is that even all this is probably moot. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am
Supreme Court denied the County's motion and confirmed the arbitrator’s decision against the County, sustaining the arbitrator's award of $27,049.20 against Nassau.The Appellate Division subsequently rejected the County’s appeal of the Supreme Court's ruling.The court said that an arbitration award violates public policy “only where a court can conclude, without engaging in any extended fact-finding or legal analysis, that a law prohibits the particular matters to be… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 3:54 pm
The Utah Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in the case of Haik v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:48 pm
Weeks v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:37 am
Supreme Court to Address Causation Requirements in Asbestos Case -Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
By Caitlin Forsyth Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:49 pm
In Matter of the Town of Waterford v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:00 am
In Byrnes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
United States, the government was able to undermine these basic rights. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Salmonson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Serova v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:34 am
Additional Resources: Kelter v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hall v Harris & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 671 (22 May 2012) Ryanair Holdings Plc v The Office of Fair Trading & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 643 (22 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smeaton v Equifax Plc [2012] EWHC 2088 (QB) (11 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd & Anor v Wilson & Ors [2012] EWHC 1353 (Ch) (04 May 2012)… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:36 am
See Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
The Holland v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:52 am
Additional Resources: Bagley v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:40 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Roszas, R (on the application of) v Baranya County Court Hungary [2010] EWHC 1265 (Admin) (18 May 2010) Dikmonas, R (on the application of) v Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania [2010] EWHC 1222 (Admin) (18 May 2010) Sanyaolu v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC B9 (Admin) (temporary reference) (17 May 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
