Search for: "MATTER OF T L S"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 9,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
” L. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am
Fidell, Elizabeth L. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:44 am
That’s what Heather L. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Weinstein, “Preliminary Reflections on Administration of Complex Litigation” 2009 Cardozo L. [read post]
7 May 2013, 12:26 am
But even the combined weight of Tribe being a mathematician and an eminent legal scholar does not persuade me that maths should be kept out of the court room – or the law school class room, for that matter. * Recommended reading: Bernstein, Peter L. (1996). [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:17 am
Requirement not to deceive is founded in duty to take care w/r/t each other’s beliefs. [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:14 pm
McGarry and David T. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
Slahi writes rather well, and even the many redactions don’t really get in the way. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
” (L. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
§ 1127) as follows:[T]he bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm
L. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:49 pm
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 605F.3d 1330, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
But the court also recognized countervailing considerations: [T]he simple fact of the matter is that these statements were published in a newspaper. ... [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Those cases are useful precedent – if defense counsel can locate them in a way that doesn’t waste the client’s money.That’s where we come in. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
Not a problem, the filing provides timely notice, and it’s a simple matter to refile as a Longshore claim. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
Not a problem, the filing provides timely notice, and it’s a simple matter to refile as a Longshore claim. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:58 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm
Ber-L-3081-09, slip op. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:30 pm
See TorPharm, 336 F.3d at 1330 (“[T]hepublic is entitled to equate an inventor’s acquiescence tothe examiner’s narrow view of patentable subject matterwith abandonment of the rest. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
The court concluded that the SEC’s actions, along with its “regrettable inaction,” were shielded by the Discretionary Function Exception, and affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
