Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5441 - 5460 of 8,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 6:38 am by Leslie Sammis
§ 741.30(5)(a)1.Restraining the respondent from contact with petitioner or any member of petitioner’s immediate family or household. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am by John L. Welch
For purposes of this chapter, a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce-- ... on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, orthe services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:18 am by WSLL
Issues: SWM presents one issue: Do the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Wyoming require that the due process considerations that underlie Wyo. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
  At one point, for example, Blatt said she hated to point out a flaw in the United States’s argument, because she used to work for it. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am by Conor McEvily
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
BRETT ALLEN PARNELL, Appellee. 5th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Injunction for protection against domestic violence -- Jurisdiction -- Domiciliary of state -- Trial court did not err in determining that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over wife's dissolution of marriage petition because wife, who was in United States on non-immigrant tourist visa, had not established actual residency with an intent to remain permanently in state -- Contrary to… [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Tejinder Singh
The United States, appearing as an amicus because it administers the FEGLIA insurance program, agrees with Maretta. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Thomas Merrill
  Hence, according to Texas, joined on this point by the United States as an amicus, the Compact itself preempts the Oklahoma laws that restrict access to its water to out-of-state entities. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 12:41 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 (Oh yeah, it’s also a distinction made by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in the AereoKiller case.) [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 12:36 pm by JP Sarmiento
After their marriage in Syria, the U.S. citizen husband came back to the United States, and immediately filed an I-130 petition on behalf of his wife. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
The exclusive right to publicly perform a copyrighted work1 has been the source of a fair amount of confusion over its history. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Hansen spoke on behalf of the petitioners; General Verrilli on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae; Mr. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
United States, holding–by a 3-2 majority–that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain CCR’s arguments on the merits. [read post]