Search for: "STATE v. SMITH" Results 5461 - 5480 of 10,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm by NL
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v Manchester. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 4 December 2019 AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:47 am by Hilde
That case dealt with Frank Spisak, a neo-Nazi who killed three people in 1982.The case is Beard v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:47 pm by carie
That case dealt with Frank Spisak, a neo-Nazi who killed three people in 1982.The case is Beard v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Stryker Corp., 669 F.3d 501, 508 (5th Cir. 2012); Smith v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
  The CJEU case of Generics BV v Smith Kline & French [1997] RPC 801 is also often cited. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Opinion below (Seventh Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition __________________ Docket: 07-360 Case name: Smith v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
 Matthew Crow, Hobart and William Smith Colleges  Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in Colonizing English America, 1580-1865. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
In contrast, presiding over Smith v Obama, U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:11 am
Smith, reports in a lengthy story:The Supreme Court will decide whether Indiana's voter ID law is too much of a burden for some people, as the state's Democratic Party argues, or is a prudent way to prevent voter fraud, as Republican lawmakers contend. [read post]