Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Health insurance company’s claim for reimbursement for certain medical cost it incurred from the “no fault” automobile insurance carrier denied Aetna Health Plans v Hanover Ins. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
Code §§ 924(c), 1951(a). [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:08 am
”[4] They see Citizen VC and the Companion C&DIs as a compliance roadmap for any issuer to contact an unlimited number of prospective investors via impersonal non-selective means (e.g., the internet) without jeopardizing Rule 506(b) compliance. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
But for yooze, yinz, and the rest of yas, here are a couple of highlights from the new resources: The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits more than just discrimination against pregnant individuals, a company cannot discrimination against individuals who: (a) were pregnant; (b) could or intend to become pregnant; (c) have a medical condition that is related to pregnancy; or (d) had an abortion, or are considering having an abortion. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
But for yooze, yinz, and the rest of yas, here are a couple of highlights from the new resources: The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits more than just discrimination against pregnant individuals, a company cannot discrimination against individuals who: (a) were pregnant; (b) could or intend to become pregnant; (c) have a medical condition that is related to pregnancy; or (d) had an abortion, or are considering having an abortion. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:03 pm
Founded initially with students in mind, who often end up paying rent for an empty room outside of term times, the company says increasingly mobile workforces are creating a need for these types of rentals. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
The Cert Petition In seeking the writ, Fried contends that every circuit court that has addressed the issue has held that Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 require a privately held corporation to disclose material information to shareholders before purchasing its stock directly from them, or to abstain from trading. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:55 pm
In Part 1, we looked at how insurance companies broadly define mental disorders and substance abuse. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
Advertisers like it b/c it resonates. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Is it b/c Reed has left us in the dust? [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
We assume that, if people say, “I think they make it b/c of that word,” there’s secondary meaning and move on. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
“Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance criterion is even more demanding than Rule 23(a). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Combination means that you can win your TM case and be entitled neither to an injunction nor to damages or profits b/c defendant wasn’t willful infringer. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:43 am
When any item of the ward’s tangible personal property has a value which when increased by the value of all other tangible personal property previously sold in the estate without a court order would exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) in the current accounting period, a guardian may sell the item only as provided in subdivision (17)b. b. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:33 am
The paper examines the directors’ duties to: (a) act with reasonable care and diligence, in the best interests of the company, and for a proper purpose; (b) avoid conflicts of interest; (c) not engage in related party transactions; and (d) prevent the company trading while it is insolvent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
And here is our reply to that: B. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 1:06 am
But giving tech companies a vague set of obligations and incentives to over-enforce isn’t the answer. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
The jury returned a verdict finding the defendants liable under FIRREA, and the federal district judge imposed civil penalties of $1.27 billion on Countrywide and $1 million on a company executive. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:19 am
a. 25 %b. 15%c. 10%d. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:52 am
In this case, a privately held company purchased its employees' shares without disclosing that it was pursuing a lucrative merger. [read post]
