Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 10:39 am
Time will be the true judge. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
This ban was distinguishable from invalid categorical bans on mere depiction of judges in attorney advertising, since portrayals of judges aren’t inherently misleading. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 11:08 pm
We’re located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 915, Los Angeles, California 90028. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:32 am
” [...].Id. at *5 (internal citations omitted).ConclusionThe petition for writ of mandamus is denied.In re Barnes & Noble at *5.NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:22 am
Google should not be taking on the mantle of copyright judge and jury – not only because it forfeits its copyright immunity when it does so (Google’s problem, not mine), but because the public is not well-served when it does so. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
This chart suggests that there was very small flurry of usage in the first half of the 1970s, with a re-emergence around 1982 or so, and then a re-introduction in 1985, with a steady increase every since. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The 1709 Blog notes, among other things, a procedural nasty that has emanated from the Dataco v Stan James database right dispute: a (wait for it ....) an application by the claimant to re-re-re-re-re-amend their Particulars of Claim. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
Not every such case will or should be certified, and as always the factual circumstances often present valid reasons why trial judges, acting within their discretion, may decide that class treatment is inappropriate. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:15 am
The judge explains that on March 11, 2013, U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
However, even if it were, it was held that all the features of a cool outer body, a hinged lid and the addition of bowl rotation, discussed in the context of the prior art, and missing from Vogt, would together require a non-obvious re-design. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
This does push TM law to change too.McKenna: agrees that this was a change in marketing that courts were noticing.Litman: just doesn’t agree with the idea that TM law was “designed” to cut retailers out; maybe a wording issue.McGeveran: consumer v. producer orientation is really important. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:19 am
By “enormous and permanent loss of No Fault benefits and protections,” we’re referring to your proposals for permanently eliminating: (1) No Fault’s existing and long standing guarantee of reasonably necessary and reasonably priced lifetime No Fault medical benefits; and, (2) auto accident victims’ expectation that their medical expenses and attendant care expenses will be covered and paid for by No Fault so long as the charges are reasonable (not whether they… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
Implications: not just nationwide priority, but possible effects on strength (this I think is wrong, though you’re starting to see cases where courts say it, as well as courts that say that incontestability means strength), and also on similarity (where the registrant has a standard character mark but usually uses a particular design, and the defendant’s design is different but the words are similar/the same). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
The problem with the suit, as the judge apparently saw it, was its untimeliness. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:43 am
When the case reached the Federal Circuit, the ten judges were split, issuing six separate opinions. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
Both cases involved identical split panels with Judges Reyna and Prost in the majority (denying mandamus) and Judge Newman in dissent. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
You’re going to pay the attorneys’ fees for the other side. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:36 pm
Lorin & Son, LLC, federal district court judge Jose E. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
The design elements (primarily a round carrier and an oval carrier) merely serve as background designs for the word WELLS, which word projects the primary significance of each mark.Magverz asserted that its mark has a "modern, cooler appearance," in contrast to the nostalgic look of the cited mark. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
” “Finally, if you’re interested in co-sponsoring an event with us in the future, please let us know; we would be delighted to work with you. [read post]
