Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 5541 - 5560 of 9,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court rejected Twitter’s arguments that the Ministry was bound to provide reasons to the users of the accounts, stating: I am of the considered opinion that notice to users of account in terms of Rule 8(1) of the Website Blocking Rules is not mandatory and that in any event, the absence of such notice does not avail to the intermediary as a ground for assailing the Blocking Orders. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
  They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court,  Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am by Scott R. Anderson, Yishai Schwartz
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 5:36 am by Aparajita Lath
The IPAB remarked – “We would also like to observe that the Registrar is duty bound to look into the Register before granting a registration. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:39 am by Chijioke Okorie
As stated in the first part, “[g]iven that the key concerns against the CAB was that if passed, it may end up before the ConCourt, it appears the Court’s decision in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & others may offer a foretaste of what could happen should the CAB end up before that court”. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
Take what I say with a grain of salt - I think Rite Hite v. [read post]