Search for: "Michaels v State"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 13,661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 8:45 am
As my colleague Michael Dorf observes in his excellent column yesterday, a key moment in the argument occurred when Justice Sotomayor asked the plaintiff’s attorney whether the state could simply fund unions from tax revenues to assure adequate representation for workers in the collective bargaining process. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:58 am
In Ozanne v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:09 am
Below, relying on the High Court’s 1977 ruling in Abood v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
House Speaker Michael E. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
In Cressman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:45 pm
Michael H. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:52 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Purcell and State Farm Mut. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Michael Carvin returned to this point during his rebuttal, reminding the Justices that, in addition to the federal government, twenty-five states already prohibit such fees and were “all fine. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Michael A. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Linert et al. v Adrien Foutz, et al., 14-1940. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
Theft of State Pension BenefitsNew York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
., the State & Local Legal Center will host a webinar on Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:37 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Theft of over $1,000 to under $10,000 Accused of stealing a lawn tractor, Michael Murphy ( hereinafter “ appellant ”) was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of theft over $1 ,000 to under $10,000. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
United States, 534 U.S.84, 94 (2001) (quoting Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
The insightful concluding sentence of Michael Dorf’s post provides an excellent starting point: “The only real question in this case is the one that Charles Black saw at issue in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
Here are the facts, from David v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:34 pm
Contributors include Professors Michael Dorf, Gillian Metzger, Kevin Walsh, Reva Siegel and Linda Greenhouse, Misha Tseytlin, Solicitor General of the State of Wisconsin, and Mailee... [read post]
