Search for: "Doe v. University of Michigan" Results 541 - 560 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 367 ] which discussesthe Galen Suppes matter:In the pending case of Curators of the University of Missouri v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
” It involves a challenge to a Michigan law imposing a one-percent tax on all paid claims by carriers or third-party administrators to health-care providers for services rendered in Michigan for Michigan residents. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In just the last few weeks, a University of Michigan professor got in trouble for showing the 1965 film Othello starring Sir Laurence Olivier (considered by many the greatest actor ever) in blackface. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am by gheriot
  Even for its supposed beneficiaries, affirmative action probably does more harm than good. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
Bollinger, a ruling that upheld the use of affirmative action by the University of Michigan Law School, based on the school's asserted need to create viewpoint diversity. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Sales Tax Clearinghouse; Tax Foundation, Facts and Figures 2018: How Does Your State Compare? [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
University of Notre Dame v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Long, Michigan State University College of Law, What if Dickens had succeded? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by David
In 2008, the Michigan Court of Appeals held in People v. [read post]