Search for: "Ely v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
For example, as was stated in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12: “National courts may reach different conclusions as to the evaluation of the evidence in the light of the relevant principles, but the principles themselves should be the same, stemming as they do from the EPC. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
DSI currently co-promotes Effient® products in the United States with Lilly. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Panacea Biotec, Ltd. of New Delhi, India ("Panacea") infringed Effient® products, Patent Nos. 8,404,703 and 8,569,325, which have been issued by the United States Patent Office. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:11 am
By Tom Watts Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
In this post, guest contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) explains the legal issues and their consequences:UKIPO -- a 'court' for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation Some courts look like this ...With Actavis v Eli Lilly [noted on the IPKat here] still fresh in our minds, and amendments to the Brussels I Regulation (recast) progressing through the European Parliament in preparation for the Unified Patent Court, jurisdictional matters are a hot… [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Louisiana joined the fray late in Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
For one thing, Louisiana is the nation’s only civil law state. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:58 pm
Speakers include in-house counsel from Eli Lilly, Mylan, Sandoz, Amgen, AbbVie, Momenta, J&J, and Actavis. [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:41 am
See Geib v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Eli” Soriano in 2001. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Lust v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Ely, Jr. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
(In Re: Actos [Pioglitazone] Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2299, No. 6:11-md-2299, Allen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
(In Re: Actos [Pioglitazone] Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2299, No. 6:11-md-2299, Allen v. [read post]
