Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 541 - 560 of 20,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
Finally, the Federal Circuit notes that “[b]ecause ‘encrypted communications’ and ‘program code’ are not being claimed here for the content they communication, they are not printed matter,” and thus, “[t]he inquiry stops there; if the claim element is not printed matter, we need not consider whether it has a functional or structural relation to its substrate. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The Board had something to say on this matter:*** Translation of the German original ***Substantiation of the ground of opposition[2.1] The [patent proprietor] has submitted that the ground of opposition under A 100(b) EPC 1973 had been insufficiently substantiated and, consequently, was inadmissible.The ground of opposition under A 100(b) EPC 1973 has  been introduced into the proceedings by the OD […]. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:11 am
It’s just a matter of turning a dial or switching freqs or something, right? [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
McGregor, a combination b/t traders from which someone was excluded. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A party is adversely affected if a decision does not accede to its requests (established jurisprudence; see T 961/00 [1]). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:07 am
For the most part we've covered the dangers of a) unwittingly signing them, like when you purchase a cell phone or get a new credit card; or b) signing them in a context where you feel you have no real choice in the matter, such as in employment contracts. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:08 pm
Very interesting district court decisions in the patent litigation context reaching opposite conclusions on teh question of whether a firm representing Client A in unrelated matters can represent a patent owner against party B where the patent owner, with other counsel, sues Client A. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm by Daniel Nathan
The SEC also found violations of the antifraud provisions, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder, arising from materially false and misleading statements found on Tomahawk’s ICO website and in its white paper. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Each allegation forms anindependent basis for a new trial under Rule 60(b)(3).JJVC does not dispute that Dr. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
In decision T 142/05, it was considered that the deletion in the description of an important desired property of the claimed subject-matter led to an extension of the scope of protection. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, the legislative history of §460(b) confirms that the legislature intended to prevent cities and counties from regulating medical services which is a matter statewide concern. [read post]