Search for: "Nate Raymond"
Results 541 - 560
of 605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 4:32 am
Nate Raymond reports for Reuters. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:24 pm
--Nate Raymond In other Churn news... [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:37 pm
(Nate Raymond, Reuters). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:09 am
Nate Raymond first reported on the opinion in his November 23, 2011 Am Law Litigation Daily article (here). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
**Nate Raymond in the NYLJ had text:Hannon said he had been unaware the applications contained text similar to Fire's patent. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
Nate Raymond’s July 27, 2011 Am Law Litigation Daily article discussing the decision can be found here. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:52 am
As Nate Raymond pointed out in his July 20, 2011 Am Law Litigation Daily article about the case (here), China Expert Technology has never appeared in the case and a default was previously entered against the company. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
Nate Raymond The American Lawyer 12-01-2011 Just a few years ago, the Abbar family of Saudi Arabia could point to at least $383 million in investments managed by Citigroup Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:20 am
Nate Raymond’s August 25, 2011 article on The Am Law Litigation Daily about the settlements can be found here. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:11 am
Nate Raymond’s February 8, 2012 Am Law Litigation Daily article discussing the suits can be found here. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:43 am
Nate Raymond's March 29, 2011 Am Law Litigation Daily article about Judge Rakoff's decision can be found here. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am
See also Nate Raymond, “GSK accuses Zofran plaintiffs’ law firms of funding academic study,” Reuters (Mar. 5, 2019). [3] See Hon. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am
See also Nate Raymond, “GSK accuses Zofran plaintiffs’ law firms of funding academic study,” Reuters (Mar. 5, 2019). [3] See Hon. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:52 am
As Nate Raymond pointed out in his July 20, 2011 Am Law Litigation Daily article about the case (here), China Expert Technology has never appeared in the case and a default was previously entered against the company. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:59 am
Nate Raymond’s May 22, 2011 Am Law Litigation Daily article about this settlement can be found here. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 12:19 am
(See for example, Nate Raymond’s commentary about the summary judgment ruling on the On the Case blog, here.) [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Additional Source: Nate Raymond, Harvard Law Review picks antiquities theft sleuth as new president, Reuters.com (January 31, 2023), available at https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/harvard-law-review-picks-antiquities-theft-sleuth-new-president-2023-01-31/. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:24 am
Nate Raymond and Ransdell Pierson’s October 9, 2012 Reuters article about the settlement can be found here. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 9th Circuit Rules E-Mail Is Not an 'Electronically Printed' Receipt - http://tinyurl.com/3ky74h2 (Nate Raymond) Bad eDiscovery Costs $60 Million Per Year - http://tinyurl.com/3z9lja6 (Lawdable) Careless Preservers Breathe Sigh of Relief when Court Finds no Relevant Info Destroyed - http://tinyurl.com/3kcewp4 (Michael Tucker) Catch Me if You Can: Guarding Firm Data From Insider Trading -… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:49 am
In what is the largest settlements so far to arise out of the subprime meltdown-related securities class action litigation wave, and apparently the largest settlement ever of a securities suit filed solely under the Securities Act of 1933, the parties to the consolidated Wachovia Preferred Securities and Bond/Note Litigation have collectively agreed to settle the suit for a total of $627 million. [read post]
