Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 541 - 560 of 1,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 9:22 am by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2014) (nonprecedential) Octane Fitness RemandPanel: Newman, Mayer, and Lourie In Octane Fitness v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
February 28, 2011) (Newman, Hall, CJJ, Restani, JCIT)John Hotaling cropped the faces from non-pornographic pictures of minor females and morphed them onto the heads of nude adult women engaged in sexually explicit conduct, including one in which the woman was handcuffed, shackled and tied to a dresser. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:02 pm by Lawrence Solum
Renee Newman Knake (Michigan State University College of Law) has posted The Supreme Court’s Increased Attention to the Law of Lawyering: Mere Coincidence or Something More? [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:26 am by Susan Brenner
” On appeal, Newman claimed the search of his vehicle violated the 4th Amendment under the decision in Gant. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Newman, Cabranes and Winter) provides insight into its prior experiences in dealing with delays and deadlines before it adopted the current rules:About ten years ago, the court faced a caseload crisis. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 4:40 pm
Salim's main argument on appeal was that his motive for attempting to attack his attorneys was immaterial, because he pled guilty only to attacking the guard. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:51 pm
As a former scientist, Judge Newman appreciated this in a way that her colleagues could not. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the Court of Appeals relies on "common experience" in determining that the case can proceed to discovery. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
The arguments are before Judges Joseph Lisa, Richard Newman, and Paulette Sapp-Peterson (Panel G). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:19 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Newman cited Schooner Peggy, which case was coveredat UChicagoLaw:My colleagues deny the motion, ruling that our recentCustomedia rulings establish that the Arthrex ruling cannot be applied to pending appeals, unless the appellant hadraised an Appointments Clause challenge in its principalbrief on appeal. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 8:05 am
October 25, 2007) (Newman, Winter, Katzmann, CJJ).This stock fraud decision deals primarily with the timeliness of a superseding indictment. [read post]