Search for: "Potter v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:59 pm
How about a mandate requiring everyone to see the most recent Harry Potter movie? [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:57 pm
Our Supreme Court, in Potter v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
See Jacobellis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
Potter. 1998. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:34 pm
Potter. 1998. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., the Fourth Circuit's recent opinion in PETA v. [read post]
