Search for: "State v. State Board of Higher Education" Results 541 - 560 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2014, 4:03 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[iii] Similar “optional” plans subsequently were enacted by the State Department of Education for its eligible employees [Education Department Optional Retirement Program, Article 3 Part 5 of the Education Law] and the then City University of New York for its eligible employees [Article 125-A, the Board of Higher Education Optional Retirement Program]. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  The stakes are higher now for all the players. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
Detroit Board of Education and, effectively, make right-to-work laws constitutionally required in all public sector employment, the Court chose not to take so drastic a step. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
The part of our taxes that goes to government speech (especially through the educational system) is, for most of us, vastly higher than the compulsory payments to a union (or a state bar), even if we are compelled to make such payments. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am by Joe Koncelik
Montgomery County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 95-M-855 (May 2, 1997); McDonald Local School District Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Board of Education, to overrule a past ruling that had rejected, rather than embraced, limits on state power—there is nothing that prevents the Court from undoing past rulings that impose limits on government. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by Eliana Baer
’” In examining the issue, the court specifically stated that “[t]he case of Finger v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
  The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
29 May 2014, 11:32 pm
In deciding minimum educational standards, there is good reason to generally allow greater regulatory oversight in cases concerning school education in contrast to higher education. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Justice Kennedy put the point: “The Seattle Court, accepting the validity of the school board’s busing remedy as a predicate to its analysis of the constitutional question, found that the State’s disapproval of the [local] school board’s busing remedy was an aggravation of the very racial injury in which the State itself was complicit. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:00 am by JB
Board of Education. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:15 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Board of Higher Education of New York City, 1956) En el año 1978, el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico le reconoció a los empleados públicos de carrera un interés propietario sobre sus empleos (Pierson Muller I v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
Board of Education in 1968, the First Amendment has protected public employees from adverse employment actions when they are “speaking as a citizen” on a matter of public concern. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The initiative impacts the state’s use of affirmative action in a number of areas, including employment, education and government contracting. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
  Several other states are likely to follow suit, banning affirmative action not only in the realm of public higher education but in other areas – such as employment decisions and public contracting – where governments currently consider race. [read post]