Search for: "T. R. T." Results 541 - 560 of 304,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the same reasoning should hold true, and this is indeed the conclusion of T 928/93 [3].Of course, the normal precautionary reaction of opponents would be to raise both grounds, even if at the time of filing one had only arguments for one of them. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Since the last set of claims still contained unsearched subject-matter, this set of claims had been considered as inadmissible on the basis of R 46(1) and R 112 EPC 1973 in conjunction with opinion G 2/92. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
He then filed a request for re-establishment but did not explain the grounds on which the request was based nor facts to support it.[8] [… T]he two-month period for filing a request for re-establishment of rights and for performing the omitted act expired on 5 March 2008 (R 131(4)). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 258/03 [headnote 1] and G 3/08 [10.7]).[5.1] This dispels the only objection that has been directly raised against the original method claims. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Decision T 870/92 [3.1] comes to the same conclusion by applying R 20(3) and R 61, which as such only govern the effect of a legal transfer on the side of the applicant patent proprietor. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Selon cette règle, une requête en révision n'est recevable que si une objection relative au vice allégué a été soulevée durant la procédure de recours, sauf lorsqu'une telle objection ne pouvait l'être (par exemple lorsque le vice n'est apparent que dans la décision). [read post]
15 May 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
Then the communication under R 51(4) indicating IT as the sole designated state was issued (June 10, 2005). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
From an aesthetic point of view, even IP lawyers know that a brand doesn't look good alongside its R or TM livery. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In addition, it follows the argument presented in T 642/12, according to which in particular the intention of the legislator must also be taken into account when introducing the fee reduction. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
By choosing the option of OPs rather than a third notification, the ED has acted within the margin of manoeuvre provided by A 94(3) and R 71(1). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:11 am
Die völkerrechtliche Parteienfreiheit ist als Garant für eine Pluralität von Parteien und damit auch für politische Meinungsvielfalt in den Vertragsstaaten zu verstehen. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is part of the professional task of representatives to decide independently – that is, without assistance from the Board – how to pursue their cases (see T 506/91 [2.3] cited with approval in R 11/08 [10]). [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:01 am by oliver
As a consequence, both the opposition and the appeal filed by the appellant-proprietors are admissible (R 77 and R 101). [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, this question had to be dealt with by the Board:*** Translation of the German original ***[2] The appeal fee is to be reimbursed if such reimbursement is equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation (R 103(1)(a)). [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:17 am by Jack D
La Cour de cassation (Cour de cassation, chambre commerciale, pourvoi n° 09-13205, 4 mai 2010) vient de se pencher sur la rémunération du gérant de société à responsabilité limitée. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Taahhüdü ihlal nedeniyle tutuklama çıkarılan Hasan Türköz, ameliyat olduğu özel hastaneden polisler tarafından Devlet Hastanesine götürülerek mahkum odasına kapatıldı.Zonguldak Ereğli ilçesinde yaşayan 30 yaşındaki Hasan Türköz yıllar önce eşine aldığı makinenin borcunu ödeyemediği için avukata… [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Remains only one decision T 1459/05, which was decided on 21 February 2008. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Armand Grinstajn
The decision T 587/98, therefore, is not considered to be particularly relevant to the present case. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Tax Problems – Obtaining Tax Relief Tаx рrоblеm tіmе іѕ an оvеrwhеlmіng and anxious tіmе fоr many Amеrісаnѕ. [read post]