Search for: "TURNER v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2015, 2:16 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:34 am
We talked about legal history, mostly -- State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
It wasn’t until 1987 that Clifford Turner and Coward Chance merged, for example, and in 2004, when Slaughter and May celebrated its 125th anniversary, most of the people who had ever been partners were still alive. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
” The “direct and material” requirement comes from Supreme Court precedent such as Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:43 am
From the 6th Circuit’s decision last week in Wheaton v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:26 am
Court Rules Calculation of Fair Market Value Under LLC Agreement’s Redemption Provision Needn’t Account for Capital Contributions Hampton v Turner, C.A. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Facts: This case (Gebremedhin et al v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:22 am
The Ninth Circuit has handed down United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Under Turner v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Huff v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Cooper v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Huff v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:41 am
Virginia, and a fundamental right and “constitutionally protected … relationship” in Turner v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
V for victory sign introduced. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by… [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
Turner, supra. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
Justice Ginsburg is up next with Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
