Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co." Results 541 - 560 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The nexus between state, CPC and United Front through the CPPCC, then, serves as the connective tissue between CPC and State constitutions, and between the political authority of the CPC and its exercise through the rule system, it itself has mandated as its own political line. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Daniel Folsom
But in subsequent decisions, the Court embraced a more nuanced approach: First, in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Ross Runkel
The Court’s 1978 decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Thus, in this latter group, the Court isn’t considering the same materials a second time; it’s considering an expanded group of materials for the first time. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 The Legal Question: “Reasonable Technical Assistance” Under the All Writs Act Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm by Charles Kotuby
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit last week decided a fairly routine contract case—applying French law (opinion here). [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
So it’s not just that the Court drew a line at a certain cutoff date and relisted cases that fell after it. [read post]