Search for: "State v. Loss"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 17,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
Judge Jolly agreed, relying on North Carolina federal court rulings that harms such as the loss of "customer goodwill" and "competitive positions, including threatened loss of market share and threatened loss of existing and potential customers" are types of injuries that satisfy the irreparable harm requirement. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
In the case, Dupuy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
The August 15, 2012 Court of Appeals opinion in DiMarco v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
State, supra. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
Gates v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:22 pm
The punitive damages claim was based on the precedent setting 2009 Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Atlantic Sounding v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:01 am
However, the rules limit the court’s ability to act and at least require an “affidavit or a verified complaint” stating particular facts which “clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:30 am
In State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns of… [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
The style is Samuel Gacia, et al, v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in the 1946 seminal ruling in Bell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
The Mead Court stated, "in an action for breach of contract, actual damages may be recovered when loss is the natural, probable, and foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct." [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
""It is undisputed that Goidell failed to bring a federal or state action against Stephens on the plaintiff's behalf before the statute of limitations applicable to the employment discrimination claim expired. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 6:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:12 pm
I'm not going to do an in depth analysis of yesterday's Cal Supremes decision in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
In a new and interesting working paper, Ilya Somin (George Mason) examines the political backlash against the Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:02 am
Koh v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 5:24 pm
” State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
