Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 21,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
The Second Circuit’s decision is, broadly speaking, a body-blow to military victims of sexual assault, but the ruling itself is worth teasing out. [read post]
Maryland Court of Appels Upholds Contributory Neligence in Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia
9 Jul 2013, 10:12 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals just issued its decision in the Coleman v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:38 pm
” KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
., v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:34 pm
Here are the actual quotes: Comparing a five-day old infant's involvuntary Type I genital mutilation to "a minor form of genital ritual," the BIA said that this act was "less extreme" than other situations in which people hack off parts of your body -- thanks for that, BIA --and "involves minimal short term-pain, suffering, and complications. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
Because if I learned anything from my four years at Dartmouth it was the impact of alcohol on the body. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:38 pm
He had been shot three times. . . .In addition to the two men Officer Wise had seen defendant shoot, the bodies of a woman and another man were also found. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
Lawrence was not present at the autopsy on the victim's body and was permitted to testify, over defendant's Sixth Amendment objection, as to the cause of death, including the amount of time the victim was choked before she died. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
And the public's probably pretty happy with the hypertechnical way the Court figures out the meaning of that word.The question is a simple one: Are you shooting "at" an occupied motor vehicle when:(A) You and the gun you're firing are outside the vehicle you're shooting "at";(B) Your hand and the gun are inside the vehicle you're shooting "at" but the rest of your body is outside it; and(C) You and the gun are… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm
One irony I see in this is that conservatives up till recently have tended to favor promoting parental-control modes in social media, or even making them the default, and have accepted the inevitability that the automated algorithms that inevitably drive these modes when applied to large bodies of material may sometimes sweep broadly enough to screen out even some responsible, sober, and fact-based discussions of topics to which parents might not want to expose younger teens. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 8:52 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:36 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 pm
Louis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:56 pm
The court distinguished between "state-sponsored arbitral bodies" (i.e. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:33 am
The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2011/2011_03234.htm * “Mandamus was one of a number of ancient common law writs and was issued by a court to compel an administrative body to perform an act required by law. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
One of the things I’ve enjoyed about Perez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:55 pm
Briefs remarks stemming from the Wałęsa v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
Case citation: Wexler v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
For example, Jackson, dissenting in Korematsu v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:29 am
Patton v. [read post]
