Search for: "Smith v. State"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 11,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
The district court predominantly relied on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
”Kristin Ahlberg, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “The Foreign Relation Series and Human Rights: Documenting the Carter Administration"Carl Ashley, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Declassifying the History of U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:36 am
This will mean that the line of cases involving saving provisions such as Lower St Properties v Jones are now irrelevant. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
Smith, who successfully argued Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am
Massey Coal, as well as the Anna Nicole Smith case. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
The panel quotes De Canas v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 2:32 am
” Warnock v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 11:23 am
These developments apparently have not yet affected a third case raising similar issues, but reaching the Court from a Texas state court, not the Fifth Circuit; that case, Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 28, 2009 Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
In particular, he contends that our statement to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
Related Issues: NSA SpyingPATRIOT ActRelated Cases: Smith v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:54 am
" This requirement was given a broad reading by the Court in 2006 in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
In Vorcheimer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 3:51 pm
Ronda Smith v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:57 pm
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California apparently got the same impression, which is why he set a TRO hearing (to be conducted via Zoom) for Monday, August 24:"CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING FOR [17] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Hearing re: [17] MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof set for… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
As recognized in a midcentury Supreme Court case about bookstores, Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
