Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm
With regards to the allegation of uncertainty, Arnold LJ applied the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Anan Kasei v Neo. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:19 am
The panel of the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, began by citing Morris v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
Reason's Peter Suderman adds (in case you weren't offended enough already): Last summer, three farm economists at Purdue University estimated that even if we just partially relaxed the renewables standard, corn prices could drop by as much as 20 percent. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:17 pm
568/20, J v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
The IPKat's friend, IP practitioner and fellow blogger Peter Groves is very excited that his IP Dictionary has now been published by Edward Elgar Publishing. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:42 pm
Long-time law:/dev/null readers might recognize Peter from this entry mentioning his new blog, The True Verdict. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:45 pm
See Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Malmesbury Abbey), a former Benedictine abbey church and now the parish church of St Peter and St Paul. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
(PatLit) (Innovationpartners) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Librarian's Notebook) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski v Doll briefs (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (AwakenIP) (BlawgIT) (PatentBIOtech) Microsoft - Storing text docs in XML may run afoul of Microsoft patent (Ars Technica) Twitter – TechRadium files suit against Twitter… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:23 pm
When the Supreme Court said in Lee v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:49 pm
See Haynes v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:15 am
First up is Borrero v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:47 pm
At first instance in the Federal Court Justice Middleton found that DKSH had not engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct or passing off by marketing and selling its Euroline coffee plunger: Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S [2010] FCA 23. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
In a post titled Dickens's 1842 Reading Tour: Launching the Copyright Question in Tempestuous Seas , Philip V. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
O Facebook ainda encorajou o uso das várias medidas disponíveis no seu site e na internet para evitar contatos indesejados. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
Holmes Beach, FL : Gaunt, 2010 2 v. ; 33 cm. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:09 am
In considering this question, Marcus Smith J considered the case law regarding the stay of proceedings and, in particular, the Court of Appeals judgment in IPCom v HTC[2]. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
, (EDTexweblog.com), (Patent Prospector), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IPBiz), (Against Monopoly), (Philip Brooks), (IPBiz), Indian government to consider whether to grant compulsory licenses to Natco for the exportation of generic versions of Tarceva and Sutent (Sunitinib) to Nepal : (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (IP Law360), (Spicy IP),GlobalGlobal - GeneralIntellectual privilege or imaginary property? [read post]
